🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by more than half, following a controversial legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more councillors depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils could only create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying local residents should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to hold binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it aims to end “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create other types of wards – including rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that voted to keep their seats.